י
י
ass
ener need two terus 31 an beri oftw #mit gutqquite exolit mort amra suf" .adesupez Introy bas mejjlaw y anizomi viimnaste
sonte Jon small bow „dano 583 13 F- ,ymolo0 ont d`e[ mit mooriətta
[im: lolqxe side to su yď mwond aww guldtok .sted nes8 mood
bania, a oe princom yebno!! ant no baqoqost solto sit
9000 te se po b vro bra sud aid to trade atuon 88 vizesn
Iteva tuodt iw judofton nt
kaimon ysḥnoй edo no softto ym da beviszs I ned"
Dani? PoLA SAS tadi acum illejut and make sal der tug mano
dot babnooeds hefst wel 2007 "2018 ent
ខ្លូនៗ ន១ ក
8
10 BIRTH Shated en wod duart,yanom siffuq to
eernuwing on,redaj mum #ifeforq art move
Y CONEBOOK NA
sarit tud bəziqəmanı tavan eni
.VIDE
fake draðmurco, izocha na at ad vos,mrotvɗo at den vit kuntad -etirmos av tri ton hiuno menjual sn-” freedowa obłw y'isjaunu
When we be
"nolakodo euoluang no asiwashire” „saboi
on at manazalis es) Imad sit of ni dasaryaq tot genom brouh
-Ion Bar Ji tælle mordi Byed teum Jantuossa ait,(5th an jdrob .81sbro II *c monal”el MA,SOF:30 TAO X-R ado abiatur batosi
G1SW 81 Io saoʻm triť en batuan yihətnəqan stjol sit tey
**orde art mibietre vonj =^jal and of tuo batxxvo gated
.ambio batelqustuos aid ni mid anitisde bas gribis bra ,1sjjam si odni noitapitasvai ne 7ot badas sono is I
"
at bnakut mer to win tignos evolvɗo sit juo gattatoq
mo In fat erit to watv nt,nedat bad I snottussera Isuaumu Irak of tmerrmmavod silt to drag sit
Bay I nem erta q va serie doet helt træerat e
aof
I ba at teta ba matenq 819% aejuello off .75) vinwoltee
do ni heitlærsq jon asw tgenza mojteyitesmal an de tre CATE
jaimkon eno aojunim wat
teksa beŋalia maaf bad
dom brES? I
W! DA
FOR ON T
5.
→
-tan mand univer) pusei dots, no soney” ni Bay I ned: „fiRI zetoně v 2,77 zi,vinuidet si Tangja liam 5 bisof no batz a lavinost I marit,(oðaðankyb a Ususbinnea stad
427
mation that I was sentenced to a fine of $750. No information
was vouchsafed as to what offence I was supposed to have
committed, which, seeing that no charge had been made, is
not surprising. I submit that the procedure at this inves-
tipation was irregular and illegal. I was not allowed to
hear the evidence adduced against me, nor to cross examine
the witnesses, of who se identity I am even now ignorant, as I
ain of the charge or charges preferred against me. I have
reason, however, to believe that among the witnesses against
+
me were some of those who sat in judgement on me, as well as the man (Chan Pui) against whom I had brought a charge of
complicity in the crime,
10.
I submit that not I but the Colonial Government
was to blame for the lose, in as much that I took every pre-
caution in my power to guard against loss of public funds,
while their refusal to allow the shroff's bond to be increased
to a sum commensurate with monies he had habitually to handle,
together with their disregard of my protests against the ab-
pointment of the dishonest accountant, rendered my efforts
nugr tory. The system which was at that time in forge, of re-
quiring each Government servent who handled public money to
find security for a sum exceeding any which would ordinarily
be in his possession, was apparently relied upon, to the ex-
clusion of other safeguards, to protest the Government, and I
submit that it was through no default of mine that the system
was abandoned in this case, but entirely though their own
fault in failing to take my advise in the matter.
11. Now Chan Pui (who, I discovered on returning from
leave in 1912, had been promoted to a higher salaried post in
the Colonial service, presumably as a reward for his actions)
has himself absconded with a very much larger sum of public
money (about ten times as mugh as he assisted Van Hau Nam
to steal), and, having been apprehended, has been tried and
convicted. This fact alone forms a strong argument for the
propriety of reopening the previous case, which has not been
tried
+
1
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.